Patent professionals understand the critical role of a comprehensive written description in line with 35 USC Section 112. However, AI inventions demand even greater attention to fully describing all aspects of an algorithm.
A recent PTAB ruling involving Microsoft's quest to patent AI algorithms for LinkedIn serves as a valuable case study.
The case highlights the significance of providing detailed support for algorithmic claim elements. It emphasizes that simply stating the desired result of an algorithm is insufficient.
The drafter must delve into the operational mechanism by which the algorithm achieves the intended outcome.
Detailed disclosure of how the algorithm functions within its environment is crucial, going beyond mere goals to provide a roadmap with additional details and examples.
This news is summarized and processed by the IP Topics artificial intelligence algorithm.
Read the full article on the original webpage: https://www.mriplaw.com/blog/79tdfni1illqg8511tto5nxki9rbc3
The cover image belongs to the source website and is used as an integral part of the summary of the reference article.
Tags:
Notizie Brevi