In the case of Ruifei (Shenzhen) Smart Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Chengyan Science and Technology Co., Ltd., the Board affirmed the precedent set by Chutter, Inc. v. Great Management Group, LLC, stating that reckless disregard for the truth is sufficient for a finding of fraud on the USPTO. The dispute centered on allegations of fraud committed by Shenzhen Chengyan in obtaining and maintaining its registration for the mark DISO for specific electronic goods. The Board emphasized that fraudulent intent must be proven by clear and convincing evidence, and in this case, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the respondent acted with intentional deception or reckless disregard for the truth. Consequently, the petition for cancellation was denied. This decision is noteworthy for its reaffirmation of the principles established in Chutter and its implications for future trademark matters.
This news is summarized and processed by the IP Topics artificial intelligence algorithm.
Read the full article on the original webpage: http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2024/07/ttab-says-chutter-still-good-law.html
The cover image belongs to the source website and is used as an integral part of the summary of the reference article.